<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing&#8217;s Big Off Topic Bonus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dfhu.org/blog/bings-big-off-topic-bonus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dfhu.org/blog/bings-big-off-topic-bonus</link>
	<description>df -h /usr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victory</title>
		<link>http://dfhu.org/blog/bings-big-off-topic-bonus/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Victory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dfhu.org/blog/?p=166#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Its too early to give advice on bing that will likely be applicable in 6 months time. But the following things i have noticed

* NOT freshing content seems to let it stay under the radar longer. Softly softly spammy text.

* Bing likes aged links with less concern for &quot;nofollow&quot; more so than G/Y, who both like aged links too.

* Bigger bonuses to sites as a whole, onsite link juice annealing seems to be weaker than G/Y. That means you can more easily shape your page rank by having a few pages with really good incoming links, which then flow their juice more easily to the rest of your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its too early to give advice on bing that will likely be applicable in 6 months time. But the following things i have noticed</p>
<p>* NOT freshing content seems to let it stay under the radar longer. Softly softly spammy text.</p>
<p>* Bing likes aged links with less concern for &#8220;nofollow&#8221; more so than G/Y, who both like aged links too.</p>
<p>* Bigger bonuses to sites as a whole, onsite link juice annealing seems to be weaker than G/Y. That means you can more easily shape your page rank by having a few pages with really good incoming links, which then flow their juice more easily to the rest of your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro</title>
		<link>http://dfhu.org/blog/bings-big-off-topic-bonus/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dfhu.org/blog/?p=166#comment-8</guid>
		<description>So what are the unique traits that you optimize for in bing over G?

My site that i started begining of july is ranking for shit in G &amp; Y! but the only page indexed thus far in Bing is the sitemap the I submitted. Not sure what to make of this of how to proceed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what are the unique traits that you optimize for in bing over G?</p>
<p>My site that i started begining of july is ranking for shit in G &amp; Y! but the only page indexed thus far in Bing is the sitemap the I submitted. Not sure what to make of this of how to proceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

